Theorem. If f:I→R is absolutely continuous with f′∈BV(I), then f is representable as a difference of two convex functions.
We need this result for generalised Ito's Lemma which works on convex functions (with an indirect route: consideration of local time process). This result seems nonstandard, and I have paid a few hours finding standard results on convex functions, the following turns out to be what I want:
Lemma (Thm 14.14 of J. Yeh's Real analysis). Let f be a real-valued function an open interval I in R. Suppose that
1) f is AC on any closed subinterval of I; andThen f is a convex function on I.
2) f′ is increasing on the subset, A, of I on which f′ exists and m(A)=m(I).
Having the lemma we can prove the Theorem immediately.
Proof. Since f is AC, fix a∈I and for any x∈I we have f(x)=f(a)+∫xaf′(s)ds. Now we can decompose f′ into a difference of two nondecreasing functions since f′∈BV, call them H,K, i.e., f′=H−K. As a result, f(x)=f(a)+∫xaHds−∫xaKds, finally we denote h=∫xaHds and k=∫xaKds. Then h,k are AC on any closed subinterval of I, moreover, h′=H,k′=K a.e. and they are increasing, therefore we can apply the lemma to conclude that h and k are convex.◼
There are many interesting and fundamental facts for convex functions that are not mentioned in UG curriculum of UST and I really suggesting reading them all, they are too standard to miss.
Still I want to record an important fact of convex functions: f′−(x) is increasing (of course) and always left continuous if f is convex, this makes if possible to define Stieljes measure by using f′−.
No comments:
Post a Comment