Processing math: 100%

Thursday, May 15, 2014

PhD Qualifying Exam for Real Analysis, Spring 2013-14 by Dr Li

I just solved all of them except for 4. As a usual practice answer of qualifying exam will not be unveiled (even to PG students in UST), let me record my solution below for future use.

The following is the set of problems a few days ago:

Problem 1. Let F be a Lebesgue nonmeasurable subset of [0,1]. Prove that there is c(0,1) such that whenever E[0,1] is Lebesgue measurable and m(E)c, then FE is Lebesgue nonmeasurable.

Problem 2. Let r1,r2,r3, be a sequence containing each rational number in [0,1] exactly once. Let f:[0,1]{r1,r2,r3}R be defined by f(x)=k=11k2|xrk|1/2. Prove that f(x)< a.e. on [0,1]{r1,r2,r3}.

Problem 3. Let S be a vector subspace of L2[0,1] with f=([0,1]|f|2dm)1/2 and suppose that there is a constant K such that for every fS and every x[0,1], |f(x)|Kf. Show that the dimension of S is finite.

My Remark. The converse is also true, and this can be generalized to every Lp(K), where p(1,) and K is compact.

Problem 4. For f:[0,1](0,), if f,lnf,flnf are Lebesgue integrable on [0,1], then find which one of the two numbers [0,1]flnfdm and ([0,1]fdm)([0,1]lnfdm) is larger. Show all details.

Problem 5. Let a0,a1,a2, be a sequence in R such that for all b0,b1,b2,R and for every k=0,1,2,, we have |kn=0anbn|210|kn=0bnxn|2dx. Prove that there exists a unique fL2[0,1] such that for all n=0,1,2,, we have an=[0,1]xnf(x)dm.

Problem 6. For n=1,2,3,, let fn:[0,1]R be absolutely continuous and fn(0)=0. If fn is a Cauchy sequence in L1[0,1] with Lebesgue measure, then prove that fn converges uniformly on [0,1] to an absolutely continuous function.
 
Problem 7. Let S1,S2,S3, be a sequence of closed sets in R2. It is known that for every xR, there exists a positive integer k such that (x,0)Sk. Prove that there exists a positive integer k such that the intersection of Sk with the real axis contains a nonempty open interval of the real axis. 

Problem 8. Let f:R(0,) be Lebesgue measurable. Prove that for every ε>0, there exists g:R(0,) Lebesgue measurable such that fg<ε and for all r>0, m{x:g(x)=r}=0.

Solution to 1. Suppose on the contrary that for every c(0,1), there is a measurable E[0,1] with m(E)c such that FE is Lebesgue measurable.

In particular, let's, for every n, choose c=11/n, then there is a measurable En[0,1] and m(En)11/n such that FEn is Lebesgue measurable. Let E=n=1En, then m(E)=1, and both E,FE are Lebesgue measurable.

Note that F=(FE)(FE), but m(FE)m([0,1]E)=m([0,1])m(E)=0, therefore FE has measure zero, and hence measurable. This implies F is measurable, and contradiction.

Solution to 2. It is enough to show 10f(x)dx<, this is a direct consequence of monotone convergence theorem and a direction integration of 101|xrk|1/2dx.

Solution to 3. My solution to this problem is long. (Please kindly share your view if a simpler solution is possible)

We will show that ¯S is finite dimensional. For this, let's "extend" the inequality |f(x)|Kf (for every x[0,1]) to f¯S.

Suppose that f¯S, then there is {gn} in S such that gnf0. Therefore gn(x)f(x) for a.e. x[0,1], and thus |f(x)||gn(x)|KgnKfa.e.. Although this inequality just holds a.e., this will be enough since later our key step will be to do integration on both sides to this inequality.

Now we show that the closed unit ball B¯S in ¯S is compact. Let f1,f2,f3,¯S be such that fn1. Note that from hypothesis |f(x)|K a.e..

By w-sequential compactness of L2[0,1], there is a subsequence {fnk} such that fnkf, and therefore fnk(x)f(x) for every x[0,1] since pointwise evaluation is a bounded linear functional on L2[0,1] by hypothesis.

Now by Egoroff Theorem, for every ϵ>0 there is compact E[0,1] such that  fnkf on E and m([0,1]E)<ϵ. Then for every j,k and for  a.e. x[0,1], |fnj(x)fnk(x)|Kfnjfnk=KE|fnjfnk|2dm+[0,1]E|fnjfnk|2dmKfnjfnk2E+4K2ϵ.
For the ϵ>0 above we can find an N such that j,k>N|fnj(x)fnk(x)|Kϵ+4K2ϵ=K1+4K2ϵa.e.. This implies j,k>NfnjfnkCϵ for some absolute constant C, so {fnk} is Cauchy in L2[0,1], so it converges to a gL2[0,1], and hence necessarily g=f a.e.. We conclude that
fnkf0.
Therefore every {fn} in B¯S has a convergent subsequence in ¯S, B¯S is compact, hence ¯S is finite dimensional.

Solution to 4. No Idea.

Solution to 5. Let φn(x)=x2C[0,1]L2[0,1]. The problem asks us to find fL2[0,1] such that f(φn)=an. So, let's define T:span{φn:n1}R by defining T(φn)=an and extending it linearly. Now we show that T is a bounded linear functional. Indeed, by hypothesis, for every b1,b2R we have |kn=0T(φn)bn|210|kn=0bnxn|2dx which can be rewritten as |T(kn=0bnφn)|210|kn=0bnφn|2dx=kn=0bnφn2, as desired.

By Hahn-Banach Theorem, we can extend T to ˆT:L2[0,1]R, then by Riesz Representation Theorem for Hilbert spaces, there is a unique fL2[0,1] such that ˆT(g)=10gfdm for every gL2[0,1]. Set g=φn, then we have an=T(φn)=ˆT(φn)=10φnfdm.
It remains to show such f is unique. Suppose that 10xn(fg)dm=0 for every n0, then by Weierstrass Approximation, 10u(fg)dm=0 for every uC[0,1]. Finally, this implies f=g a.e. since m is a regular measure.

Solution to 6. We just need to recall that fn's are differentiable a.e. and has the formula fn(x)=x0fn(t)dt due to absolute continuity. The the rest follows from completeness argument several times.

Solution to 7. The hypothesis says that R×{0}=k=1(Sk(R×{0})). Since R×{0} is a closed subspace of R, it must be complete. By Baire Category Theorem, there is a k such that BR×{0}(a,δ)=B(a,δ)(R×{0})Sk(R×{0}) for some aR,δ>0.

Solution to 8. Let ε>0, then define δn=nε2, the intervals (δn,δn+1]'s form a partition of (0,) with δn+1δn<ε. We "redefine" f on each of En:=f1(δn,δn+1] for n0. Since En can still be unbounded and wild, let's further partition it into Enk=(f1(δn,δn+1])[k,k+1). Now we "linearize" f on Enk by setting g|Enk to be a linear segment joining the points (k,δn) and (k+1,δn) for xEnk, where δn<δn<δn<δn+1.

The intervalwise linearization on Enk,k=1,2, shows that g|Enk is injective for each k and thus g|1En({r})=kZg|1Enk({r}) is countable for every n, and  hence g|1En({r}) has measure zero, so does g1({r}).

Finally we verify that fg<ε. For every xR, xf1(δn,δn+1] for some n0, and hence xEnk for some k, but then both f(x),g(x)(δn,δn+1], so |f(x)g(x)|<ε.

No comments:

Post a Comment