Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Monday, March 1, 2010

Problems of MATH202 # 17 of the last week

Since I am busy doing my work in another course, this weekly post is delayed til today :(.
Of the problems, only 5, 6, 7 are of our interest.

Problem 5. Let f:RR, be a three times differentiable function. If f(x) and f(x) are bounded functions on R, show that f and f are also bounded functions on R.

My way.
Just make good use of the expansion f(x+h)=f(x)+f(x)h+12f(x)h2+13!f(x+θh)h3, for some θ(0,1).

Problem 6. If f(x) and g(x) are n times differentiable and f(n1)(x),g(n1)(x) are both continuous in [a,b. Then there exists a number c(a,b) such that f(b)f(a)n1k=1(ba)kk!f(k)(a)g(b)g(a)m1k=1(ba)kk!g(k)(a)=(m1)!(n1)!(bc)nm(f(n)(c)g(m)(c)).

NO IDEA, I am just able to prove the case when m=n.

Problem 7. Let f be p times differentiable on R and let Mk=sup{|f(k)(x)|:xR}<, k=0,1,2,,p and p2. Prove that M12M0M2 and Mk2k(pk)2M1kp0Mkpp$,for$k=1,2,,p1.
My way.
(1) Same as the case of problem 5, replace h by h to construct another equation (remember to choose different θ), subtract two equation, observe that 02M0+2M1h+M2h2 for any h, while discriminant 0, we are done.
(2) In exactly the same manner as (1), we conclude that Mj+12MjMj+2 for all jp2. Now we take product nj=m on both sides, having Mn+1Mm+1(2)nm+1Mn+2Mm. Before we proceed, we first consider two cases. If Mk=0, then the inequality we are asked to prove obviously holds since right hand side is always non-negative. In case if Mk>0, then we take the product k1m=0 on both sides of Mn+1Mm+1(2)nm+1Mn+2Mm, it results in Mkn(M0Mk2k(2nk+1)/2)Mkn+1.
(I remember I have replaced n by n1 to make the inequality seem better), we are interested in this because it is a beautiful (in the sense of solving the problem) reccurence relation, we have a direct consequence Mkn(M0Mk)pk2n+pk1j=nk(2jk+1)/2Mkn+pk=(M0Mk)pk2k(pk)(2n2k+p)/2Mkn+pk. Finally, we take n=k, MpkMpk02k(pk)p2Mkp.

No comments:

Post a Comment