Since I am busy doing my work in another course, this weekly post is delayed til today :(.
Of the problems, only 5, 6, 7 are of our interest.
Problem 5. Let f:R→R, be a three times differentiable function. If f(x) and f‴(x) are bounded functions on R, show that f′ and f″ are also bounded functions on R.
My way.
Just make good use of the expansion f(x+h)=f(x)+f′(x)h+12f″(x)h2+13!f‴(x+θh)h3, for some θ∈(0,1).
Problem 6. If f(x) and g(x) are n times differentiable and f(n−1)(x),g(n−1)(x) are both continuous in [a,b. Then there exists a number c∈(a,b) such that f(b)−f(a)−n−1∑k=1(b−a)kk!f(k)(a)g(b)−g(a)−m−1∑k=1(b−a)kk!g(k)(a)=(m−1)!(n−1)!(b−c)n−m(f(n)(c)g(m)(c)).
NO IDEA, I am just able to prove the case when m=n.
Problem 7. Let f be p times differentiable on R and let Mk=sup{|f(k)(x)|:x∈R}<∞, k=0,1,2,…,p and p≥2. Prove that M1≤√2M0M2 and Mk≤2k(p−k)2M1−kp0Mkpp$,for$k=1,2,…,p−1.
My way.
(1) Same as the case of problem 5, replace h by −h to construct another equation (remember to choose different θ), subtract two equation, observe that 0≤2M0+2M1h+M2h2 for any h, while discriminant ≤0, we are done.
(2) In exactly the same manner as (1), we conclude that Mj+1≤√2MjMj+2 for all j≤p−2. Now we take product ∏nj=m on both sides, having √Mn+1Mm+1≤(√2)n−m+1√Mn+2Mm. Before we proceed, we first consider two cases. If Mk=0, then the inequality we are asked to prove obviously holds since right hand side is always non-negative. In case if Mk>0, then we take the product ∏k−1m=0 on both sides of √Mn+1Mm+1≤(√2)n−m+1√Mn+2Mm, it results in Mkn≤(M0Mk2k(2n−k+1)/2)Mkn+1.
(I remember I have replaced n by n−1 to make the inequality seem better), we are interested in this because it is a beautiful (in the sense of solving the problem) reccurence relation, we have a direct consequence Mkn≤(M0Mk)p−k2∑n+p−k−1j=nk(2j−k+1)/2Mkn+p−k=(M0Mk)p−k2k(p−k)(2n−2k+p)/2Mkn+p−k. Finally, we take n=k, Mpk≤Mp−k02k(p−k)p2Mkp.
No comments:
Post a Comment