Problem 3. Let {an} and {bn} be two sequences such that limn→∞an=limn→∞bn=c, suppose f′(c) exists. Show that limn→∞f(bn)−f(an)bn−an=f′(c).
My way.
I have to put some restictions to ensure my deduction is correct. If f′(x) is continuous near c, then we are done with the Mean Value Theorem. But it, first and foremost, requires f(x) to be differentiable.
To avoid continuity of derivative, we inevitably set Mean Value Theorem aside, then differentiability of f(x) other than c doesn't carry weight any more. But I have to suppose we always have an<c<bn or bn<c<an for sufficiently large n, this assumption will be used later on. By the fact that the existence of first order derivative implies the existance of linear approximation near c, we have for any x near c, f(x)=f′(c)(x−c)+f(c)+o(x−c), Here for any ϵ>0, there exists a δ>0 such that 0<|x−c|<δ⟹|o(x−c)x−c|<ϵ2.
While for any δ0>0, there exists an N such that n>N⟹|bn−c|,|an−c|<δ0, we take δ0<δ, now for n>N,=|f(bn)−f(an)bn−an−f′(c)|=|f′(c)(bn−c−(an−c))+o(bn−c)+o(an−c)bn−an−f′(c)|=|o(bn−c)+o(an−c)bn−an|≤|o(bn−c)bn−c||bn−cbn−an|+|o(an−c)an−c||an−cbn−an|<|o(bn−c)bn−c|+|o(an−c)an−c|(by the assumption)<ϵ.
Redo example 10. Show that 2<651/6<2+1192.
My way.
The left hand side is obvious. For the right hand side, observe that 65=2(1+126)16<2(1+16⋅26)=2+1192. We have used (1+x)α≤1+αx,∀x≥0,∀α∈[0,1].
Problem 6. Let f:[0,∞)→R be continuous and f(0)=0. If |f′(x)|<|f(x)| for very x>0, show that f(x)=0, for every x∈[0,∞).
My way.
Instead of considering [0,12], we can consider any interval [0,p], p<1 first. It can be shown that by mean value theorem,|f(x)−f(0)|<|f(yn)||x|=|f(yn)−f(0)||x|<|f(yn−1)||x||yn|<⋯<|x||yn|⋯|y2||f(y1)|<pn|f(y1)|,∀x∈[0,p]. Letting n→∞, we get f(x)=inf{pn|f(y1)|:n∈N}=0. We can show by induction that f(x)=0, for all x∈[(n−1)p,np],n∈N in the same manner.
Problem 9. Give an example of a function that is differentiable on (0,1) and f(0)=f(1) but does not satisfy the Rolle's Theorem.
My way.
Define f(x)=√x,∀x∈[0,1) and f(1)=0.
Additional problem. Let f(x) be a differentiable on [a,b], f′(a)<f′(b), for any y0∈(f′(a),f′(b)), prove that there exists c∈(a,b) such that f′(c)=y0.
My way.
Since that f is differentiable cannot imply the continuity of f′. Intermediate value theorem fails to work here. We on the contrary define a new continuous function, g(x)=f(x)−y0x. It can be easily varified that g′(a)=f′(a)−y0<0 and g′(b)=f′(b)−y0>0, then extreme value cannot be attained at the end point, the minima must lie somewhere else in the interval (a,b), hence there exists c∈(a,b) such that g′(c)=0⟹f′(c)=y0.
No comments:
Post a Comment